HTA agencies in EDiHTA

HTA processes differ significantly across countries, shaped by their healthcare systems’ structure, with national or regional implementations sometimes causing duplication of clinical benefit assessments, particularly in decentralised systems. Most HTA recommendations are non-binding, but their impact on coverage decisions varies; in some countries non-binding recommendations are de facto mandatory for reimbursement. EU cooperation could streamline HTA activities, reduce duplication of clinical evidence assessments, and harmonise methodologies, especially for medical devices, where evaluation processes are fragmented and less advanced. Stakeholder engagement, including patients and healthcare experts, varies widely, influencing transparency and uptake of HTA outcomes.

The Role of HTA agencies in EDiHTA

  • HTA agencies are integral to the EDiHTA project, contributing their expertise from the outset to shape a scientifically robust and practically applicable framework. Their active involvement in pilot testing and validation ensures the framework remains relevant to the evolving digital health landscape while meeting high assessment standards.

  • HTA agencies will benefit from EDiHTA by gaining enhanced capabilities to evaluate digital health technologies with a harmonised, evidence-based framework that promotes consistency across Europe. The project supports capacity building through training, knowledge sharing, and networking opportunities, enabling agencies to stay at the forefront of digital health assessment. Additionally, their involvement helps shape future guidelines and regulatory standards, influencing digital health policies while ensuring patient care, cost-effectiveness, and innovation are prioritised.

  • EDiHTA is dedicated to equipping HTA agencies with the tools and insights needed to effectively evaluate Digital Health Technologies. Collaborating alongside regulatory bodies, clinicians, payers, researchers, and patient representatives, HTA agencies help foster a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach to evaluating DHTs. Furthermore, as key players in healthcare systems, HTA agencies have the power to drive innovation while safeguarding patient safety and advancing sustainable healthcare solutions.

Norwegian Medicines Agency (NMA)

  • Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services (SBU)
  • Dental and Pharmaceutical Benefits Agency (TLV)

Finnish Coordinating Center for Health Technology Assessment

  • Institute of Family Medicine and Public Health
  • Ministry of Social Affairs (MoSa)
  • Estonian Health Insurance Fund (EHIF)
  • National Health Service (NHS, Lativa)
  • State Agency of medicines

State Health Care Accreditation Agency

  • Gesundheit Österreich GmbH (GÖG)/Geschäftsbereich
  • Dachverband der Sozialversicherungsträger (SSVB)
  • Austrian Institute for Health Technology Assessment (AIHTA)

Agencja Oceny Technologii Medycznych i Taryfikacji (AOTMiT, The Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Tariff System)

  • Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices
  • Federal Joint Committee
  • Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care
  • Ministry of Health of the Slovak Republic
  • Comenius University in Bratislava
  • NIHO
  • Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic
  • State Institute of Drug Control

National Health Care Institute (ZIN)

  • Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE)
  • National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance

Breadcrumb Home News Luxembourg Agency for Medicines and Health Products

  • Healthcare Improvement Scotland
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)
  • Health Technology Wales

French National Authority for Health

  • AGENAS, National Agency for Regional Health Services
  • Centro Regionale Unico sul Farmaca del Veneta
  • Sede del Ministro – Ministero della salute
  • Regione Emilia-Romagna
  • University Hospital A. Gemelli
  • Unita di Valutazione Technology Assessment
  • Spanish Network of Agencies for Assessing National Health System Technologies and Performance
  • The institute of Health Carlos III
  • AETSA, Andalusian Agency for Health Technology Assessment
  • AQuAS, The Agency for Health Quality and Assessment of Catalonia
  • Avalia-t, The Galician Agency for Health Technology Assessment
  • OSTEBA, Basque Office for Health Technology Assessment
  • IACS, The Aragon Health Sciences Institute
  • HTA Unit from the Madrid region 
  • SESCS, Evaluation and Planning Unit – Directorate of the Canary Islands Health Service

Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA)

  • Administração Central do Sistema de Saúde, I.P.
  • NFARMED, National Authority of Medicines and Health Products

National Institute of Pharmacy and Nutrition (NIPN)

National Agency for Medicines and Medical Devices of Romania

National Council on Prices and Reimbursement of Medicinal Products

  • JAZMP, Agency for Medicinal Products and Medicinal Devices of the Republic of Slovenia
  • Ministry of Health of the Republic of Slovenia
  • Agency for Quality and Accreditation in Health Care and Social Welfare 
  • Croatian Health Insurance Fund

Minstry for Health and active Ageing (MFH), Directorate for Pharmaceutical Affairs (DPH)

Ministry of Health

National HTA Organisations and Their Role in Decision-Making

A national HTA organisation/body is a legal entity having a clearly defined, often formally supported through legislative acts, role in the national HTA production process to inform decision-making on reimbursement, pricing and/or provision of health technologies in the country.

HTA processes differ significantly across countries, shaped by their healthcare systems’ structure, with national or regional implementations sometimes causing duplication of clinical benefit assessments, particularly in decentralised systems. Most HTA recommendations are non-binding, but their impact on coverage decisions varies; in some countries non-binding recommendations are de facto mandatory for reimbursement. EU cooperation could streamline HTA activities, reduce duplication of clinical evidence assessments, and harmonise methodologies, especially for medical devices, where evaluation processes are fragmented and less advanced. Stakeholder engagement, including patients and healthcare experts, varies widely, influencing transparency and uptake of HTA outcomes.

HTA agencies are integral to the EDiHTA project, contributing their expertise from the outset to shape a scientifically robust and practically applicable framework. Their active involvement in pilot testing and validation ensures the framework remains relevant to the evolving digital health landscape while meeting high assessment standards.

Your input matters: Join us in our mission to shape the future of the European HTA landscape.
Do you represent an HTA agency and you want to collaborate with us? Get in touch! 

Prof. Americo Cicchetti
EDiHTA project coordinator 

Receive the latest news

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Stay informed about latest EDiHTA results, conferences, and milestones.